@deliver_els, Author at Employment Law Services (ELS) LTD

Mandatory Vaccines & Vaccine Passports: A Winter of COVID Discontent?

Posted on 15 September 20219 June 2023 by @deliver_els

Covid-19 has created many challenges but one of the most contentious is the introduction of mandatory vaccines for Care Workers in England and vaccine passports in Scotland.

Scientists have told us that the COVD-19 vaccine is very effective at preventing serious ill health and hospitalisation but that it does not prevent somebody from contracting COVID or transmitting it. Why then has there been a push to introduce compulsory vaccinations and vaccine passports and what is the current position across the UK?

The Current Position on Mandatory Vaccines & Vaccine Passports

In England

On 22 July 2021 the UK Government passed new regulations which will amend the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 (SI 2014/2936) to require workers deployed in Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulated care homes in England to be fully vaccinated unless they are exempt from 11 November 2021 and the UK Government intends to consult on whether to extend the requirement to workers in the health and social care sectors.

Apart from the new regulations requiring workers in Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulated care homes in England to be fully vaccinated, there is currently no legislative power for the UK government to mandate COVID-19 vaccination across the board and to do so would require further primary legislation.

On 13 September 2021 Health Secretary Sajid Javid confirmed that plans to introduce vaccine passports for access to nightclubs and large events in England will not go ahead.

In Scotland

On 9 September 2021 and with support from the Scottish Greens, the devolved SNP Administration in Scotland approved plans for vaccine passports for those seeking entry to nightclubs and large-scale events from 1 October 2021.

In Wales and Northern Ireland

At this time, the devolved administrations of Wales and Northern Ireland have not set out their positions in respect mandatory vaccines and/or vaccine passports.

Implications of Making COVID-19 Vaccines Compulsory

In its 2019-20 report on seasonal influenza vaccines, Public Health England’s reported that one in four healthcare workers did not get a flu vaccine and there are early indications that roughly the same proportion of people are wary of having COVID-19 jabs, a view that appears to be reflected in a recent YouGov poll which indicated that out of a total of 5,351 adults surveyed, a majority (44%) oppose compulsory vaccination compared with a minority (33%) that support it.

Despite public opinion and the fact there is currently no legislative power to mandate COVID-19 vaccination across the board in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and in England (for Employers outside the care sector), many Employers across the UK are still considering making COVID-19 vaccines compulsory for those entering the workplace. However, those that choose to impose such a requirement may be exposing themselves to several issues, including:

Mandatory vaccination could be indirectly discriminatory against certain protected characteristics and a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Vaccination is not suitable for everyone.

A vaccination requirement may be difficult to justify on health and safety grounds because the current advice is that vaccination is not a substitute for workplace COVID-secure measures which must still be complied with.

Consultation with workplace and health and safety representatives, and with trade unions, is likely to be required.

Data protection implications inclusive of requiring employees to provide information on their vaccination status, verifying its accuracy, and retaining that data.

Notwithstanding the potential legal challenges Employers might face by making COVID-19 vaccines compulsory for those entering the workplace, Employers could face division among their workers and an exodus that could leave them short staffed and unable to fill vacancies.

Vaccine hesitancy exists for many reasons. Some people can’t have the vaccine for medical reasons and will likely fall under one of the exemptions, but others may be hesitant or refuse on religious or spiritual grounds or due to a fear of vaccinations generally. Employers considering making COVID-19 vaccines compulsory for those entering the workplace should consider ALL the facts very carefully before pressing ahead.

Acas advises that employers should support staff in getting the vaccine without making it a requirement, and encourage them to do so by, for example, offering paid time off to attend vaccination appointments.

Implications of Mandatory Vaccine Passports

Although the devolved Scottish Administration are alone in introducing vaccine passports for those seeking entry to nightclubs and large-scale events, the UK Government and devolved Administrations of Wales and Northern Ireland haven’t ruled this out, so similar issues to those associated with compulsory vaccines may arise not only Scotland but across the UK.

Some might argue that vaccine passports are an iron fist in a velvet glove approach to imposing mandatory vaccines by stealth and others might argue that such a scheme denies people the freedom of choice by limiting what they can do and where they can go without a vaccine passport but whatever way you look at it, the imposition of vaccine passports will potentially give rise to the same issues mandatory vaccines creates. Other issues which vaccine passports may give rise to include:

Will staff working at nightclubs and/or venues hosting large-scale events be required to have a vaccine passport? If they aren’t vaccinated, will they be denied work?
If they are denied work, who will pay them?

If the employer denies them work and/or pay won’t that be a breach of their contract of employment giving rise to claims for breach of contract, unfair dismissal and/or discrimination?

If ticket holders at large-scale events are denied access because they don’t have a vaccine passport, will they simply lose out or will they be entitled to a refund?

Who will pay the refund, the venue or the government? If it’s the venue, will it be entitled to compensation?

Are vaccine passports and requiring individuals to provide information on their vaccination status to stewards at nightclubs and large-scale events indirectly discriminatory against certain protected characteristics and a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights?

Avoiding a Winter of COVID Discontent

Forcing people to do something, either directly or indirectly, will almost always invoke strong feelings and will often also involve competing rights. For example, an individual’s right to choose verses another individual’s right to be safe in the workplace and the community.

However, when it comes to compulsory vaccines for those entering the workplace and mandatory vaccine passports for those wishing to enter nightclubs and/or large-scale events, whose rights should prevail?

Across the UK uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine has been high with 89% of the over 16’s having had the first does and 80% over 16’s having had the second dose. With booster doses becoming available to the over 50s and for those in the 12 to 15 age bracket as early as next week, we will likely see a sharp increase in voluntary vaccinations across the UK in the weeks ahead that will take us to a vaccination level high enough to keep everyone safe but without the need to push compulsory vaccination and vaccine passports further.

Employee entitled to full commission that had been deferred during furlough (ET)

Posted on 24 August 20218 June 2023 by @deliver_els

In a commission arrangement where an employer has any form of discretion, an employee has the right for that discretion to be exercised rationally and in good faith.

Mr Sharma was employed as a Business Development Manager by Lily Communications Ltd. During his recruitment in 2019, the employer’s commission scheme was discussed. Mr Sharma was told that he would earn 15% commission on all profit. He accepted the role on this basis. From 19 March 2020 to 12 August 2020 (when his employment terminated), Mr Sharma was furloughed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to the pandemic, his employer decided that commission for furloughed employees would be deferred and they would not receive any commission payments while on furlough (but might receive payments afterwards).

Following the termination of his employment, Mr Sharma brought claims for breach of contract and unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of unpaid commission payments. The employment tribunal found that Mr Sharma was not contractually entitled to be paid commission. However, when his employer exercised its discretion to do so, it was contractually obliged to act rationally and in good faith. The tribunal also found that there was no requirement for Mr Sharma to meet targets to be paid commission. Consequently, to the extent that his employer had withheld commission for months in which targets had been met, this was not rational. For months in which targets had not been met, withholding of commission was irrational or not in good faith given the lack of requirement to meet targets.

By contrast, the tribunal found that the decision to defer commission payments for furloughed employees was rational and in good faith, with the uncertainty arising from the pandemic perhaps being a “paradigm example” of a situation in which an employer would want to exercise its discretion regarding commission payments differently. There was no suggestion by Mr Sharma that his employer was prevented from exercising its discretion in this way. However, when his employer later chose to exercise its discretion to pay some of his commission on 31 August 2020, it was obliged to act rationally and in good faith. In the absence of any rationale or justification for not paying Mr Sharma his full commission “entitlement” at that time, it had acted irrationally.

Case: Sharma v Lily Communications Ltd ET/1900437/21 (25 March 2021) (Employment Judge Davies).

Legal Implications on Returning to Offices as Lockdown Restrictions Ease

Posted on 13 July 20219 June 2023 by @deliver_els

As lockdown restrictions continues to ease across the UK, we consider the legal implications for employers on workers returning to offices and the steps they should be taking to mitigate risks.

The Easing of Lockdown Restrictions

As Coronavirus continues to impact the day-to-day operations of businesses across the UK, Prime Minister Boris Johnson has announced that most Covid restrictions will be lifted across England on 19 July.

Restrictions in other parts of the UK have also started to ease and Mainland Scotland and the Scottish Islands not already in Level 0 look set to move Level 0 from 19 July, but the Scottish administration has made clear in its latest updated framework that it will continue to promote home working where possible. It is important to note that Employment Law is reserved to the UK Government, so although the Scottish administration can give its recommendation to businesses it is extremely restricted in its ability to make financial and legal changes to support home working so it is unlikely that any compulsory changes will come into effect that mandate home working as Scotland moves into Level 0.

The details of precisely what restrictions remain in place can be found in the updated guidance published by each of the four nations:

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/working-safely-during-coronavirus-covid-19/offices-and-contact-centres

https://www.gov.scot/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-returning-to-offices/

https://gov.wales/keep-wales-safe-work-html

https://www.nibusinessinfo.co.uk/content/coronavirus-guide-making-workplaces-safer-and-priority-sector-list

Managing the Transition Back to Work

Many employers adversely impacted by the Covid restrictions will undoubtedly be relieved that they can reopen and those who have already reopened albeit on a restricted basis will also be relieved that they can now ramp up their operations, but employers must remember that the legal position and rights of employees being required to return to work remain the unchanged.

Employers will need to manage the transition carefully and not lose sight of the fact that the Covid pandemic may have also adversely affected the lives of many of their workers in a variety of different ways, so a cautious and consultative approach with workers and unions is recommended.

The push to have workers return to their normal place of work could give rise to a variety of issues, including:

Flexible working requests
Grievances
Unfair dismissal claims
Health and safety and whistleblowing claims
Discrimination claims

The Legacy of Covid-19 Restrictions

As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic a ‘new’ normal has emerged and the harsh reality is that after over a year of working from home and other flexible working arrangements being in place many businesses have continued to function, so many workers may be resistant to returning to workplaces and reverting to the “old” way of doing things.

The key to avoiding issues is to plan well in advance and to consult with workers about these plans in order to address any questions or concerns they might have which may need to be addressed and actioned and to ensure unnecessary surprises are avoided.

The legacy of the Covid-19 pandemic and the myriad of challenges this has created for employers and workers alike is likely to be long-lasting and the benefits of having a robust and sustainable plan for the future cannot be understated.

Employers Must Pay More Towards Furloughed Staff from 1 July 2021

Posted on 30 June 20218 June 2023 by @deliver_els

Until 30 June 2021, the UK government will continue contributing 80% of an employee’s wages for furloughed employees, capped at £2,500, but from 1 July this contribution will reduce on a sliding scale until the scheme ends at the end of September.

For July, employers will only be able to claim 70% of wages for furloughed staff, up to a maximum of £2,187.50

For August and September, employers will only be able to claim 60% of wages for furloughed staff, up to a maximum of £1,875

This means that employers who intend to continue to rely on the furlough scheme will need to make up the difference between what they can claim and what they are required to pay furloughed employees (80% of their wages, up to a cap of £2,500 per month for the time they spend on furlough) if they want to remain eligible for the CJRS grant.

With many employers still not able to fully reopen and many still struggling to generate revenue to cover existing operating cost, this additional uplift in costs may cause them to reconsider their position.

Here, we previously considered the implications for Employers due to the delay in the easing of lockdown restrictions and Redundancy and the impact of COVID-19

Support from Employment Law Services (ELS)

Implications for Employers Due to the Delay in the Easing of Lockdown Restrictions

Posted on 16 June 20219 June 2023 by @deliver_els

The long-awaited exit from lockdown has been delayed, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson warning a spike in cases of the Delta (Indian) variant could lead to a surge in hospitalisations.

Emerging from Lockdown – Guidance for UK Employers

COVID-19 Restrictions Continue to Impact UK Businesses

On Monday 14 June 2021, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced that the full easing of all lockdown restrictions planned for 21 June 2021 in England has been potentially delayed by a period of 4 weeks, subject to a further review in 2 weeks’ time.

The devolved administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland had previously announced an easing of restrictions which brought them closely in line with those restrictions set out at step 3 of the roadmap in England but considering the PM’s announcement on Monday it looks increasingly unlikely that any further easing of restrictions will be announced any time soon, or at least before the end of June.

A Disjointed Four Nations Approach to Lockdown Restrictions

Since the devolved administrations of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland decided to break lockstep with the UK government in favour of adopting their own approach to lockdown restrictions, many have been left confused and uncertain about what is or isn’t permissible.

In England, where a four-step roadmap out of lockdown is in place, more businesses were able to reopen when England moved to step 3, but the decision to delay the full easing of lockdown restrictions and remain at step 3 will create serious implications for employers who had hoped all COVID-19 restrictions would end on 21 June 2021 as originally planned.

Covid-19 Restrictions in England

In Scotland, where a five-tier protection system (0-4) is in place and which can be applied separately to each local authority area, more businesses were able to reopen from 5 June 2021 when many areas moved from level 3 to level 2 and from level 2 to level 1, subject to remaining social distancing restrictions, but soft play, nightclubs and adult entertainment venues must remain closed and many businesses in the tourism, hospitality and events sectors remain adversely affected.

Covid-19 Restrictions in Scotland

In Wales, where a four-level alert system is in place (1-4), some restrictions were eased from 7 June 2021 when Wales moved from level 2 to level 1. Many more businesses were able to reopen, but skating rinks, nightclubs and adult entertainment venues must remain closed.

Covid-19 Restrictions in Wales

In Northern Ireland there has also been a slight easing of restrictions and many businesses have been able to reopen, but the overriding message is that working from home where possible should remain the default position and that employers should take every step possible to facilitate home working.

Covid-19 Restrictions in Northern Ireland

The Delay on Easing Lockdown Restrictions – Implications for Employers

The Prime Minister’s announcement was in response to a notable rise in the R number across all regions of the UK and continuing concerns over the impact of the Delta (Indian) COVID-19 variant.

For those businesses with employees currently working from home, the default position across all regions of the UK is that employees who can work from home should continue to do so.

There is no change to the guidance in respect of employees who cannot work from home – in these circumstances, employees continue to be permitted to work in their usual workplaces, and the working safely during coronavirus guidance continues to apply.

The delay in any further easing of lockdown restrictions is impacting all businesses, but those in the tourism, hospitality and events sectors appear to be affected most, not least due to continuing restrictions on how many people venues can safely accommodate with social distancing measures in place.

Practical Considerations for Employers

Many employers may also need to reassess their staffing requirements and quickly decide what this means for any recent job offers and current furlough arrangements and the cost implications of extending furlough beyond 1 July 2021 will need to be carefully considered.

Although the furlough scheme was previously extended until 30 September 2021, the level of grant available to employers will be reduced from 80% (up to a max. of £2,500):

From 1 July 2021 the grant available to employers reduces to 70% (up to a max. of £2,187.50).
From 1 August it will reduce again to 60% (up to a max. of £1,875).

Can an employer withdraw offers of employment or delay start dates for new recruits in light of the COVID-19 outbreak?

The first point to consider is whether a contract of employment has been entered into with the new recruits.

If the new recruits have accepted an offer of employment without conditions, and there is therefore a binding contract of employment, then notice would need to be served in order to terminate the contract before they commence employment. If there is a binding contract in force between the parties then any change in the start date will constitute a change in contractual terms. In this case, an employer would only be able to make a change to the start date either with the express consent of the new recruits or if it has an express contractual right to do so.

How should an employer go about making redundancies?

It may not always be possible for an employer to avoid making redundancies, even where alternatives are considered first. There are five principles for employers to follow when considering redundancies as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic:

Do it openly. The sooner people understand the situation, the better for everyone.

Do it thoroughly. People need information and guidance so ensure that you have trained staff representatives in how the redundancy process works.

Do it genuinely. Listen to people’s views before making a decision, be open to alternatives from individuals and unions and always feed back to them.

Do it fairly. Any redundancy procedure should be conducted fairly and without any form of discrimination.

Do it with dignity. Consider ahead how to handle the conversation and whether it will be face-to-face or remote. The way an employer makes redundancies says a lot about the organisation’s values.

We considered Redundancy and the impact of COVID-19 in a recent bulletin – Redundancy – Getting it Right For Employers

Redundancy – Getting it Right For Employers

Posted on 7 June 202112 June 2023 by @deliver_els

On 26 May 2021, Kemi Badenoch MP, the Minister for Equalities, made a statement outlining that the gendered impact of the pandemic has not been clear cut. In summary, the Government confirmed that more men were made redundant during the pandemic than women.

Workplace Redundancies – What Every Employer Should Know

Although women were furloughed at a disproportionate rate than men, she stated that the latest employment figures indicated that more men were made redundant than women. As a response, the government is working to address both men and women with its economic support measures.

Redundancy and the Impact of COVID-19

Despite the various resources intended to support businesses and protect jobs, an increasing number of employers are finding it difficult to retain current staff levels as COVID restrictions continue to impact.
With the CJRS ending in Septmber, many employers are now looking closely at redundancies.
Correctly identifying the circumstances that give rise to redundancies is the first step to ensuring any subsequent redundancy dismissals are fair.

A recent survey from Acas has found that over a third of employers (37%) are likely to make staff redundancies in the next 3 months. The poll found that:

6 out of 10 large businesses said they were likely to make redundancies in the next 3 months
for businesses that are likely to make redundancies, over a quarter (27%) said they plan to do this remotely over video chat or a phone call
1 in 4 (24%) bosses are unaware of the law around consulting staff before making redundancies – this increases to 1 in 3 (33%) where businesses have fewer than 50 workers

Circumstances That Can Give Rise to a Redundancy Situation

There are various circumstances that can give rise to a redundancy situation, including:

Diminished need for employees to do work of a particular kind.
Changes to terms and conditions where more than 20 employees are affected, and dismissal is a possibility.
Reduction in the numbers of employees doing a particular role.
Removal of a role or group of roles.
Closure of a department, site or entire business.

Many Employers often conflate the aforementioned circumstances with other reasons when considering redundancies, but they do so at their peril. For clarity, the following reasons do not give rise to a redundancy situation:

Issues of performance, conduct.
Where an external company could do the work better or more cheaply.
The same work could be done under different terms and conditions e.g. less qualified.
Where the employee is required to do additional work, but it remains “work of the same particular kind” and they refuse to do that.
Transfers of employment.

Before considering redundancies, it’s important that employers review the situation carefully before deciding to progress with redundancies. Key points employers should consider include:

Issues that need to be addressed in a redundancy situation:

Alternative to Redundancies

Employers have a legal obligation to consider how they might avoid compulsory redundancies. Some of the alternatives they should consider include:

Short time working and/or temporary layoffs – the new Job Support Scheme is intended to facilitate this.
Voluntary redundancy.
Temporary reduction in pay or hours.
Permanent reduction in pay or hours.
Redeploying to alternative roles and providing retraining (if reasonable).
Dismissing short service employees (where no risk and T&Cs allow).
Reducing/removing benefits.
Stopping/limiting overtime.

Other considerations include:

Is there a job that would be a suitable alternative within any associated business or alternative sites?
Does ‘Bumping’ apply? This is where an employee not previously at risk is put at risk to ‘save’ other employees.
Are any affected employees pregnant?
Are any affected employees on maternity leave?
Are any senior roles affected?

Employers will need to proceed with caution if any of the above scenarios apply.

If Making Less than 20 Redundancies

Under 2 years’ service:

If under 2 years’ service, and no risk of discrimination, a shorter process can be followed if the contract/handbook allow that.
No entitlement to redundancy pay, just notice pay.

Risk of discrimination or over 2 years’ service:

A minimum of three meetings (at risk, how can we avoid, if no ideas, dismissal).
If pools of candidates, objective criteria will need to be used relating to that particular role.
Scoring needs to be fairly done.
Right of appeal.

If Making 20 or More Redundancies

Where 20 or more employees to be made redundant at one establishment within 90 days:

Need to collectively consult with appropriate representatives.
Representatives are recognised trade union or employee representatives elected through a ballot.
Must provide prescribed information via HR1 to BEIS.
Must consult for at least 30 days before the first dismissal or for 100 days if more than 100 employees.
Right of appeal.
Protective award for a failure to consult = 90 days gross pay.

Where Most Employers Go Wrong With Redundancies

Employee Consultation

To avoid the risk of being deemed not to have consulted properly, employers need to consider the consultation process carefully and ensure:

Consultation is meaningful, with a view to getting agreement, not a means to an end.
It includes those off on long term sick leave, family friendly leave, fixed term (funding).
They involve a recognised union or collective consultation body (if authorised to consult on such matters), where required.
Letters are issued at each stage and 48 hours’ notice between meetings and the right to be accompanied is made clear.
Minutes are taken at each meeting.

The Implications of Getting Redundancies Wrong

Unfair dismissal claims

Not genuine redundancy (the real reason for dismissal).
- Unfair process.
- Unfair selection.
- Unfair scoring.
  - Maximum compensatory award £88,519.

Discrimination claims.

Unlimited compensatory award.

Employers – Avoid an Own Goal During This Summer’s UEFA Euro Tournament

Posted on 31 May 20218 June 2023 by @deliver_els

The rescheduled UEFA Euro 2020 tournament kicks off in Rome on Friday 11 June 2021 and runs through to Sunday 11 July and many Employers may be faced with staff looking to watch their team during normal working hours.

Football,Player,Covers,Own,Face.,The,Goalkeeper,During,The,Game

With COVID-19 restrictions still in place across many parts of the UK and many employees still on furlough, this year’s tournament might be less impactful for UK employers, but many may still experience some difficulties as many excited football fans look to watch matches their teams are competing in.

With kick off times ranging from 2pm to 8pm, employees looking to watch matches could still phone in sick or worse, they might simply not turn up, and this could have serious implications for employers already struggling to get back to normal after enduring more than a year of COVID-19 restrictions.

To help Employers better understand the risks and equip them with tools to better manage the situation and create a positive outcome for both employer and employee, we’ve outlined below a few keys points Employers should consider.

Potential Issues Employers Might Face

Unauthorised absence
Staff being drunk / under the influence of alcohol at work
Inappropriate conduct by employees – discrimination, racism, bullying or harassment
Increases in holiday requests from both football and non-football fans alike

Ways Employers Could Avoid Issues

1. Ensure You Have Clear Policies in place including:

Sickness & Absence Policy
Code of Conduct
Discipline & Grievance Policy
Bullying & Harassment Policy
Drugs & Alcohol Policy
Equality & Diversity Policy

2. Manage absenteeism in advance.

Make it clear to employees that absences without authorisation will not be paid and may lead to action under the Disciplinary Policy.
Utilise Return to Work Interviews to identify and address fake sickness absence or absent resulting from post-match hangovers

3. Reconsider Your Holiday Arrangements

Relax caps on the number of employees that are allowed to be on holiday at one time
Where staff have indicated they want to see certain matches, encourage them to take the time off as annual leave.
Remember non-football fans may make holidays requests during the same period and so you will need to ensure you treat all holiday requests fairly and equally. Granting a holiday request by a male employee but refusing a holiday request from a female employee could trigger a claim of sex discrimination!

4. Some Other Things to Consider

Screening matches in a meeting room or communal area.
Relaxing your Internet Policy and allow employees to stream matches on their PCs.
You will need to ensure you have the appropriate licenses in place which allow screening or streaming of live TV within the workplace.

Support for Employers

Employment Law Changes in April 2021

Posted on 5 April 20218 June 2023 by @deliver_els

From 1st April 2021, national minimum wage rates increased but April sees a number of further changes to Employment Laws from 4 April 2021.

Employment Law Review – What Changed in 2020 & What to Expect in 2021

On 1 April 2021, we highlighted the changes to the National Minimum Wage Rates last week, but there are a number of further changes which come into effect from 4 April 2021 including, changes to statutory sick pay, statutory family leave pay, Employment Tribunal compensation awards and rates and IR35 legislation.

Statutory Family Leave

From 4 April 2021, the weekly rates of statutory family leave (maternity/paternity leave, etc.) increased by 77p per week, from £151.20 per week to £151.97 per week.

Statutory Sick Pay

From 6 April 2021, the weekly rates for Statutory Sick Pay increase from £95.85 per week to £96.35 per week. The lower earnings limit in relation to eligibility to statutory payments is to stay the same at £120 per week.

ET Compensation Awards and Rates

From 6 April 2021, employment tribunal compensation rates are to increase. The maximum week’s pay for redundancy pay purposes will increase from £538 to £544. This is important for the purposes of tribunal claims because it means that the maximum statutory redundancy pay, as well as unfair dismissal basic award pay, will both now be £16,320. The unfair dismissal compensatory award, which is set to compensate the claimant for past and future lost attributed to the dismissal, is a maximum of 52 weeks’ pay, subject to a new maximum of £89,493.

The maximum amount of additional award for unfair dismissal, set to compensate claimants when employers fail to adhere to a tribunal instruction to re-engage them, taking into account average weekly earnings, will rise to £28,288.

IR35 Legislation

The IR35 legislation, which aims to ensure that contractors are paying the appropriate amount of tax, is also changing for some private sector businesses. Currently, most contractors are required to determine their own status as employee or contractor; however, from 6 April 2021, this liability will pass to medium and large-sector clients. Smaller clients will be exempt from this obligation, and the contractor remains liable for determining their own tax status.

New National Minimum Wage Rates From Today

Posted on 1 April 20219 June 2023 by @deliver_els

From 1st April 2021, national minimum wage rates increase and the National Living Wage age threshold reduces.

The new national minimum wage hourly rates, which come into effect from 1 April 2021 are as follows:

Workers aged 23 and over (National Living Wage) – £8.91
Workers aged 21-22 – £8.36
Development rates for workers aged 18–20 – £6.56
Young workers rate for workers aged 16–17 – £4.62
Apprentices under 19, or over 19 and in first year of the apprenticeship – £4.30.

And don’t forget…..the National Living Wage (NLW) threshold is also lowering to include all those aged 23 and over. Currently, the NLW is payable only to people who were aged 25 and over.

Uber to Pay Drivers Minimum Wage, Holiday Pay & Pensions

Posted on 17 March 202112 June 2023 by @deliver_els

After losing it’s lengthy Supreme Court battle just less than one month ago, Uber have announced it will give its 70,000 UK drivers a guaranteed minimum wage, holiday pay and pensions.

Last month we confirmed Uber’s lengthy legal battle to overturn the 2016 Employment Tribunal (ET) decision had finally came to an end when the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against them and concluded drivers should be classed as workers, not independent third-party contractors – https://employmentlawservices.com/uber-loses-landmark-supreme-court-battle-over-workers-rights/

In the weeks following the Supreme Court’s ruling, Uber have carefully considered their position and announced yesterday that it will give its 70,000 UK drivers guaranteed minimum wage, holiday pay and pensions. The taxi company confirmed that all drivers can expect to earn at least the National Living Wage for over-25s, irrespective of age, after accepting a trip request and after expenses, that they will be entitled to paid holiday based on 12.07% of their earnings, which will be paid on a fortnightly basis, that they will also be enrolled into a pension plan automatically, with contributions from Uber, that they will continue to receive free insurance in case of sickness or injury as well as parental payments, which have been in place for all drivers since 2018 and retain the freedom to choose if, when and where they drive.

It will be interesting to see if Uber will extend this decision to its food delivery business, Uber Eats, which remains unaffected by this decision.

The Supreme Court ruling in this case was always going to have far-reaching implications for millions of people working in the gig economy and the companies that employee them, but only time will tell whether other employers operating in the gig economy will follow Uber’s lead.